Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
1.
PLoS Med ; 10(5): e1001422, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23667339

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic treatment for pneumonia as measured by Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) is a key indicator for tracking progress in achieving Millennium Development Goal 4. Concerns about the validity of this indicator led us to perform an evaluation in urban and rural settings in Pakistan and Bangladesh. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Caregivers of 950 children under 5 y with pneumonia and 980 with "no pneumonia" were identified in urban and rural settings and allocated for DHS/MICS questions 2 or 4 wk later. Study physicians assigned a diagnosis of pneumonia as reference standard; the predictive ability of DHS/MICS questions and additional measurement tools to identify pneumonia versus non-pneumonia cases was evaluated. Results at both sites showed suboptimal discriminative power, with no difference between 2- or 4-wk recall. Individual patterns of sensitivity and specificity varied substantially across study sites (sensitivity 66.9% and 45.5%, and specificity 68.8% and 69.5%, for DHS in Pakistan and Bangladesh, respectively). Prescribed antibiotics for pneumonia were correctly recalled by about two-thirds of caregivers using DHS questions, increasing to 72% and 82% in Pakistan and Bangladesh, respectively, using a drug chart and detailed enquiry. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring antibiotic treatment of pneumonia is essential for national and global programs. Current (DHS/MICS questions) and proposed new (video and pneumonia score) methods of identifying pneumonia based on maternal recall discriminate poorly between pneumonia and children with cough. Furthermore, these methods have a low yield to identify children who have true pneumonia. Reported antibiotic treatment rates among these children are therefore not a valid proxy indicator of pneumonia treatment rates. These results have important implications for program monitoring and suggest that data in its current format from DHS/MICS surveys should not be used for the purpose of monitoring antibiotic treatment rates in children with pneumonia at the present time.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/normas , Países em Desenvolvimento , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/normas , Pneumonia/terapia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Adulto , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , Cuidadores/psicologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Pré-Escolar , Características da Família , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Rememoração Mental , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Prevalência , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Projetos de Pesquisa , Serviços de Saúde Rural/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Gravação em Vídeo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...